Second, we propose to amend § 98.45, as redesignated, to explicitly allow Lead Agencies the discretion to waive co-payments for two additional populations—eligible families with income up to 150 percent of the Federal poverty level and eligible families with a child with a disability as defined at § 98.2. Current regulations allow Lead Agencies to waive co-payments for families in particular circumstances ( i.e.,with incomes below the Federal poverty level, families in need of protective services or other factors as determined by the Lead Agency). The proposal would not alter the existing option that allows Lead Agencies to waive co-payments for families in need of protective services or to determine other factors for waiving co-payments. Lead Agencies have chosen to use this flexibility to categorically waive co-payments for certain vulnerable populations, including those who benefit from Temporary Assistance for Needy Families , children enrolled in Head Start, families experiencing homelessness, children in foster care, and teen parents. States’ ability to waive co-payments for these children and families, and other factors determined by Lead Agencies, remains. While the proposed policies will limit the amount of family co-payment that CCDF families will have to pay, the child care providers must still be compensated for that amount.

• Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov.
• We also propose conforming renumbering changes to existing paragraphs through .
• Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Health and Human Services Department for review.
• For example, parents may be forced to choose between delaying the start of a new job, forgoing a job opportunity altogether, or paying for care that is either unaffordable, unregulated, or lower quality.

Further detail and explanation can be found in the regulatory impact analysis. In addition, current CCDF payment rates and practices used by many States, Territories, and Tribes do not adequately cover the cost of providing high-quality care, particularly in low-income communities, undermining child care availability and parent choice. Some child care providers may find that relying on federally-subsidized child care introduces significant financial instability, which threatens their business viability. This instability may also lead providers to avoid serving families using child care subsidies. Changes made by this proposed rule would have the most direct benefit for the over 900,000 families and 1.5 million children who use CCDF assistance to pay for child care. Families who receive CCDF assistance will benefit from lower parent co-payments, more parent choice in care arrangements, expanded and easier access to child care which could improve the ability of families to participate in the labor market, and improved eligibility determination processes.

Difference Between Power System Reliability & Stability

A State argued that the new elements were duplicative of information that States are required to report in their CCDF Plans, and would involve significant costs, especially for States with county-administered CCDF programs. We seek comment on whether this requirement should be removed, including the potential implications of instituting, or removing this reporting requirement. To make it easier for eligible families to access child care services, we propose a change at § 98.21, as redesignated, to require Lead Agencies implement eligibility policies and procedures that minimize disruptions to parent employment, education, or training opportunities to the extent practicable. Policies that lessen the burden of CCDF administrative requirements on families applying for child care assistance in turn improves access to child care and can improve families’ economic wellbeing. Evidence suggests the initial CCDF eligibility determination process remains difficult, confusing, and overly burdensome for some parents and poses a barrier to accessing affordable child care for families with low incomes. Burdensome application processes discourage families from applying for child care assistance, delay access to child care, and can cause substantial stress to parents.

The policies explored in this RIA relate to presumptive eligibility and additional child eligibility, which are categorized as transfers. The new policy related to applying online, which is described as a benefit, is discussed in the subsequent benefits section. Tribal Construction and Major Renovation Liquidation Period.We propose to revise § 98.84 to lengthen the liquidation period for tribal construction and major renovation funds to give tribal lead agencies sufficient time to carry out construction and major renovation projects, which can take many years to plan and execute successfully. The authority to request to use their CCDF funds for construction and major renovation given in section 658O) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 9858m) has been an important Tribal flexibility in the CCDF program. Between FY 2018 and FY 2023, approximately 120 Tribal Lead Agencies set-aside a portion of their CCDF funds to construct or renovate child care facilities in their service area, ultimately improving child care services in tribal communities by building the supply of child care in areas that lacked providers. Tribes have incorporated design features that support the delivery of safe, high-quality care and promote child development, as well as cultural components that reflect each tribe’s values and beliefs.

Improving Child Care Access, Affordability, and Stability in the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)

In another study, among a nationally representative sample of Head Start children, children were on average absent 5.5 percent of days (or 1.2 days per month). However, 12 percent of children were chronically absent, that is, absent for more than ten percent of days (or more than 2.1 days per month). And in a study of kindergarten attendance in one county in a mid-Atlantic state, researchers found that on average, kindergartners missed 9.9 days of school ; that works out to about 1 day per month.

Not only is child care expensive for most families, but more than half of families in the United States live in communities where potential demand for child care outstrips supply by at least three to one . However, the RIA only quantifies the estimated impact of the NPRM on the Lead Agencies, parents, and providers that interact with the CCDF program, which is only a small portion of the child care market. Whether a family can access and afford child care has far reaching impacts on labor market participation and potential earnings, which then affects businesses’ ability to recruit and retain a qualified workforce, affecting overall economic growth.

Conditionally Stable System

We propose new language at § 98.21 to clarify that the minimum twelve-month eligibility requirement described in § 98.21 applies when children are newly added to the case of a family already participating in the subsidy program. This proposal does not reflect new policy, as section 658E (42 U.S.C. 9858c) and § 98.21 do not provide exceptions to the 12-month minimum eligibility requirement. However, because the existing regulations do not explicitly address this scenario, there has been inconsistent implementation of the requirement in which additional children ( e.g.,newborn or school age child needing after school care) in the family have not received 12 months of care before redetermination. Therefore, we propose to codify the requirement to address confusion around the policy. Thus, ACF recommends that Lead Agencies implement these strategies to reduce the administrative burden for families and, at a minimum, offer both paper and online applications to implement this important strategy that can ease access to child care and strengthen family economic wellbeing.

In addition to payment rates, policies governing provider payments are an important aspect of equal access and support the ability of providers to provide high-quality care. Generally accepted payment practices for parents who pay privately for child care, which is most parents, require a set fee based on a child’s enrollment, generally in advance of when services are provided. Payments by parents who pay privately typically are not adjusted due to child absences. definition of stability Lead Agencies need clear data and strategies to address gaps in the supply of child care. However, current reporting requirements make it difficult to understand supply assessments. At revised proposed paragraph , we continue to require Lead Agencies include in their CCDF plans a description of the supply of care, including identifying shortages in the supply of high-quality providers and a list of the data sources used to identify the shortages.

Dictionary of Nautical TermsRate this definition:0.0 / 0 votes

Multiple qualitative studies found that parents receiving subsidy continue to experience substantial financial burden in meeting their portion of child care costs. Other research shows that higher out-of-pocket child care expenses (which may include co-payments) reduce families’ child care use and parental employment. Given that co-payments have been shown to limit parents’ access to child care among CCDF-participating families in terms of both parents’ ability to afford particular child care settings as compared to higher-income families , ACF proposes to make changes to § 98.45 to reduce parent co-payments. Tribal Lead Agencies vary significantly in how they administer the CCDF subsidy program, including with many tribal lead agencies operating their own child care programs with CCDF funds. Therefore, a requirement to use grants and contracts would not be feasible though it remains an option for those Tribal Lead Agencies that would like to use this funding mechanism. Tribal Lead Agencies would still be required to take steps to address and report on supply gaps.

Figure \(\PageIndex\) shows that the cg of a chicken is below the hip joints and lies above a broad base of support formed by widely-separated and large feet. But if you’re not running your own web server, or you’re not a system administrator, you’re just running Linux on your desktop, should you care all that much about stability? Of course, when programs change the layout of their buttons and menus it can sometimes be a pain, but typically….those updates also come with other useful features you might want. If you lock yourself into old software that never changes where the buttons are, you’re also locking yourself out of those new features you might want. And are you so opposed to a button getting moved once in a while that you want to miss out on new features entirely? But I suspect most of us can handle the occasional change in layout, if it’s not constant.

Products and services

An example of the Stability strategy is when a company sells an old product with a new one to its clients to maintain its market share. The company is satisfied with its market position and stock performance. While it is mainly used by corporations competing in a particular market segment; the stabilization strategy has also been recently used by the Governments around the world such as the Government of the United States of America to retain its dominant position in the world. Suppose a 900-kg car is on the bridge in Figure 13 with its center of mass halfway between the hinges and the cable attachments. (The bridge is supported by the cables and hinges only.) Find the force in the cables.

This creates a transfer in resources from the child care provider, who previously had to continue running the program without funding on days when the child was absent, to the Lead Agency. This shift in funding would decrease available funding for the Lead Agency, and therefore, could result in a decrease in the number https://www.globalcloudteam.com/ of children served. Based on our estimated amount of combined transfers and the average subsidy payment amount, we estimate that the proposed transfers for these required policies could lead to a reduction in caseload of approximately 4,800 children per year, or about a third of 1 percent of the FY 2020 caseload.

What is stability? Definition and meaning

Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.,as amended) , all Departments are required to submit to the Office of Management and Budget for review and approval any reporting or recordkeeping requirements inherent in a proposed or final rule. As required by this Act, we will submit any proposed revised data collection requirements to OMB for review and approval. While many tribes have successfully used CCDF funds to build or renovate child care facilities, other tribes have been thwarted by the limited time available to spend the CCDF funds. Current regulations allow tribes to liquidate or spend construction and renovation funds during the year of the award or the two years following the year of award.