First statistical analyses were achieved playing with descriptive statistics such as for instance the fresh accuracy of your own procedures, indicate results and you can proportions.
To choose and this subscale will be within the regression analysis, a relationship anywhere between all the measurement out of sexting and its particular subscales is used. People notably associated sext expectancy subscale try within the regression to choose whether it predicts the latest subscales of the sexting inspiration survey (Intimate aim, Muscles Visualize Support, Instrumental/Aggravated Reasons) and sexting decisions.
Secondly, i held linear regression between the Social media Habits and you can sexting issues to check the theory, consistent with the books [11,forty five,46,47], you to definitely a sophisticated out-of addiction predicted a top deeper desire to sext.
Fundamentally, to do new model and you will make sure if your behavioral/emotional troubles while the defensive means had a job when you look at the sexting, i presented independent linear regressions between your internalizing/externalizing subscales off Youthfulness/Mature Self Declaration, Foundation 1 and you will Factor dos off REM-71 and you can SBQ, SMQ, Sq. New analyses had been used playing with SPSS application (Version 21.0, IBM, Armonk, New york, USA).
step 3.1. Sexting Motivations, Behavior and you can Expectancy
As regards the descriptive analyses concerning sexting motivations and sexting behavior, males have a higher score in almost all sexting dimensions except sexual purposes in which females have a slightly higher score (Table 1). However, conducting several ANOVAs we found that the only significantly different dimension is that of sexting https://kissbrides.com/sv/blogg/hur-att-hitta-en-fru/ behaviors where males have a higher score (SBQ score: female M = 33.8; male M = 36.5, p < 0.05,>
In addition, ANOVAs were conducted between males and females on sexting expectations. The results show a significance for two subscales of the Sexpectancies Questionnaire: negative expectations about sending sexts ( p < 0.001,>
The correlation analyses between the SMQ, SBQ and SQ have shown the results summarized in Table 2. Briefly, positive expectations of sending are strongly related to all dimensions of sexting, motivational and behavioral (respectively: p < 0.001>
Consistent with the study of Currin , we conducted regressions between SMQ, SBQ as regressors and SQ as a predictor. The detailed results in Table 3 show that sexting behavior is predicted only by positive expectations of sending ( p < 0.001,>
The check for multicollinearity in every regression in the present paper was conducted by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Conventionally, as suggested by Cohen and O’Brien , VIF values greater than 4–10 generally indicate severe multicollinearity. Our results are VIF < 3,>
step three.2. Social media Addiction and you may Sexting
Out of analysis on the social media habits (female: M = 14.0 and DS = 5.59; male: Meters = 12.8 and DS = 5.10), the newest ANOVA anywhere between women and men failed to let you know one statistically significant difference between the two teams.
Basically, you are able to say that an advanced out of societal news dependency may cause significantly more desire to help you sext and you may participate more often for the sexting decisions.
step three.3. Internalizing/Externalizing Problems, Protective Approach and Sexting
As regards the descriptive analyses on Youth/Adult Self Report and REM-71, the only statistically significant differences between males and females are given below. It emerges that females have higher levels in internalizing scales on youth/adult self-report ( p < 0.001,>
Secondly, we wanted to test our hypothesis that immature defensive strategies correlated with a more problematic type of sexting, such as instrumental/aggravated or body image reinforcement. To do this, we considered the two factors of REM-71 in correlation to each dimension of sexting motivations and behaviors. Correlation analysis found no significant relationship between sexting and factors 1 and 2 of REM-71. For this reason, from an exploratory perspective, we decided to investigate the individual subscales of REM-71, maintaining a more conservative p -value ( p < 0.01).>